Here's how Week 2 goes
Week 1 packed the window for one message; this week you keep it working across a whole conversation.
The window fills
A conversation is the window growing turn by turn. Watch a Monday-morning chat below: six turns, three tasks, and one rule that quietly stops holding.
Five turns on, the rule from turn 1 is buried under everything that followed. Still steering, less and less. And the cap you set for drafts just clamped an agenda blurb, too: old constraints drag into new work.
Longer, stiffer, and more than twice the cap you set in turn 1.
Every word is still in the window. The chat grew, the oldest instruction faded from attention, and the draft drifted. That is the cue to wrap up and start fresh, and the next move shows you how.
You'll feel this in your own chats before you measure it. Three signals it's time for a fresh chat:
Give each piece of work its own chat.
Spotting those signals is Discernment at work: you read each answer against what the window actually holds, and you call the restart.
The window didn't shrink, and the text is all still there. So what changed?
Show what's going on →
Claude weighs everything in the window, and recent turns pull hardest, so a turn-1 rule steers less and less even though it never left. Restate what matters or start fresh; the optional section below covers the research.
Carry it forward
Starting fresh costs nothing if you carry the decisions with you. The whole move takes three steps and about thirty seconds.
- Ask the old chat to wrap up. Use the prompt below; Claude writes the summary from everything it can still see.
- Start a fresh chat with the New chat button. The new window is empty, so every word you load gets full attention.
- Paste the summary in. Add the file if the work still needs it, and pick up where you left off.
Summarize the decisions we made and what's still open, so I can start a fresh chat.
That wrap-up is Description pointed at your future self: you write the opening context for the next window.
Memory in the app
Some context can outlive the chat. Where memory is available in our workspace, Claude carries a short set of stable facts between conversations, and you decide what's on the list.
Stable facts, carried between chats
Your role, how you like drafts, the work you keep coming back to. Those facts ride into new conversations without being retyped.
You do, in Settings
Week 1 said you don't pick what memory surfaces mid-chat. The list itself is yours: click your initials in Claude, choose Settings, and open Memory to see each saved fact and edit or remove any line. Read yours once this week, the same way you'd review your instructions for Claude.
Memory is context you curate, and the gate applies to it.
Real work, run properly
This week the course points at your own plate. Pick one task you run every week or month, and run it through Claude properly one time.
Hello [contact name],
Every DC CAP team is running the training on its own real tasks this week. Earlier weeks stay open for anyone catching up, and the capstone window closes September 25. Thank you for making this work possible; happy to walk through the site any time.
[Your name]
The second ask did the real work. Checking the draft against the file, and against what you know about the reader, is Discernment; the fix took one sentence.
- Pick the task: a recurring update, summary, or draft that touches a document.
- Open the document and check it first: nothing pointing to one scholar or family.
- Attach the file with the + beside the message box, and warm up with one question the document can answer. Check the reply against the page.
- Send the five-part brief. Read the draft against the file, name one gap, ask for one fix.
- End the chat with the wrap-up prompt either way: fresh chat, paste the summary in, ask for one refinement.
What you can do now
You can watch a window fill, restart without losing work, and curate the context that persists. Check what landed:
This is your own check that the week landed. It stays in your browser — nobody else sees it.
Support, whenever you need it
Reach out to Preston anytime; office hours run 9–10 AM ET every weekday. Bring the task you ran, or the moment a chat went stale on you. We are stronger when learning together.
Under the hood
Skip it and lose nothing. Three questions people usually ask about long chats and memory.
Why do things fade in the middle?
Claude weighs everything in the window when it predicts the next word, and the weighting concentrates at the very start of the window and on the most recent turns. In a long chat, the stretch between gets the least attention, so an instruction from twenty turns back still sits in the window while steering less and less. Researchers call the pattern "lost in the middle," and it shows up across AI models, without anyone designing it in. Restating what matters, or starting fresh with a summary, moves the important material back to where attention is strongest.
What does memory store, and who controls it?
Memory keeps short, stable facts, like your role or a standing formatting rule, rather than transcripts of your conversations. Where memory is available in our workspace, Settings shows the full list, and you can edit or delete any entry. Two habits keep it useful: review the list occasionally so it stays current, and run the gate before anything gets saved, because each memory enters every future window. A stale or unsafe memory misleads every chat at once, which is exactly why you're the curator.
Why does a fresh chat often beat a marathon?
A marathon chat carries every constraint, tangent, and dead end you've passed through, and Claude weighs all of it: edits meant for the kickoff note bleed into the Friday agenda. A fresh chat opened with a carry-forward summary holds only what the task needs, so every word gets full attention.